Attended the All Candidates Forum @ the Polish Community Centre last night, although I suppose that is a misnomer, since Salomon Rayek of the Conservatives failed to show. From coast to coast, Conservative candidates are in Stealthmode, so much so, a new website Harpocracy.ca has sprung up to maintain a running count of all of the neoConservatives who have been muzzled by their Brigadier General, Stephen Harper.
I really don't know what could be more shocking... during an election,
candidates are refusing to meet with constituents, refusing to explain their
parties' positions, refusing to participate in DEMOCRACY for heaven's sake.
Again, if this is their conduct during an election, what can any of
us expect if they get in? How can Canadians even consider voting for a party that conducts itself in such a way?
The Main Event
Candidates Present:
Kimball Cariou - Communist Party of Canada
Doug Warkentin - Green Party of Canada
Wendy Yuan - Liberal Party
Donna Petterson - Marxist-Leninist Party
Don Davies - NDP
Right off the bat, the format of the forum was not popular and a lot of people actually left gradually as it played out. It was designed so candidates pulled straws and sat at different tables (Children & Youth,Women's Issues, Immigration & Multi-cultural issues & Poverty Reduction & Housing) and a facilitated discussion took place amongst the parties at the tables.
The Candidates rotated to other tables and then reported out to the larger group. It was good to have some time with candidates, however, it was only one candidate, for a short time, with important discussion carrying on, but not reported on.
Question Time
The question & answer part of the evening also caused some frustration for those asking questions and the candidates. Individuals could direct a question to one candidate and then only one other candidate could get answer the same question. It was just not a succcessful way of proceeding, since constituents had very little
chance to actually hear the differences of the different party platforms.
No offense to the candidates for the Communist & Marxist-Leninist parties and I appreciate the fairness involved in inviting them, but this detracted from being able to hear from the real contenders in this election:
Don Davies, Wendy Yuan & Doug Warkentin.
The Performances
Right off the bat, Wendy Yuan's public speaking challenges became apparent when she was reporting out from the small group discussions. Anyone seeing her last night would have had to developed some serious misgivingsabout her experience and ability to speak in Parliament as our representative. She was not articulate, she said
"uh" almost constantly, isn't a quick thinker on her feet, her command and facility of English is still coming along, she wasn't able to connect with the audience, she was easy to throw off, she was evasive and quite simply was unable to discuss some of the issues.
Right off the hop, Ms. Yuan committed a cardinal sin of public speaking, especially in an election panel. When asked what her party's position was on the Security & Prosperity Partnership (SPP) and Canada's integration into the European Union, she told the audience she thought Canada's involvement with Europe was good, that the Liberal party didn't have a position on the SPP and that she would talk to the questioner "privately" on the matters. There was a collective gasp from the audience at that last bit.
Ms. Yuan also appeared to have sparked some serious anger and hostility from some of the Chinese Falun Gong members in the audience, when she was evasive in answering whether she had stated in a speech the previous day in the Chinese community that China's human rights issues were something they needed to handle internally. It was quite interesting that when the second Falun Gong person was attempting to ask her to confirm her previous answer that she was almost playing some sort of game and she asked him three times to repeat himself, as she didn't understand him. It almost
seemed like some sort of mocking of the man's English. Finally, another woman came over to explain and Ms. Yuan really offended this contingent, who were angrily stating that she was lying to the crowd and they have what she said on tape.I did not get the impression they would leave this one to die and I'd be worried if I were Ms. Yuan.
Now, what was interesting was Don Davies (NDP) followed up with some comments about meeting with a delegation of Falun Gong members in his office recently to discuss the issues, ensuring that the crowd got a glimpse of him as an inclusive and compassionate person, interested in the human rights of all.
Mr. Davies also made two promises to those in attendance.
1. He would never walk across the floor.
2. That he would always have an open door to his constituents.
Mr. Davies also "outed" Ms. Yuan, telling the audience that she rented an apartment in the Collingwood neighbourhood for appearances going into the election. Ms. Yuan had told the audience she, her husband and son had been living in a place in the neighbourhood for over a year. She called this a cheap shot by Mr. Davies, but he was following up with questions asked by a constituent - do you live in the riding, for how long & if you don't, why do you think you can represent the neighbourhood? It was in this set of questions that the frustration of the candidates with the format could also be seen.
There really wasn't a lot more that stood out for me. These were the impressions I was left with:
Ms. Yuan - Despite really wanting to be the V-K candidate, just does not have the leadership, or political experience, the
public speaking, nor credibility to represent this constituency. She also doesn't have the connection to the diverse people of the community and it is really difficult to understand how she would be able to represent the interests of all citizens
in the riding. Last night demonstrated that she has managed to let down, or even betray members of the Chinese community.
I think one of the things last night did for me was demonstrate that although someone can be a hard worker, "successful" (Ms. Yuan made sure we knew she was a successful businesswoman) and wants something really, really badly, doesn't mean they are qualified, or would be good at what they want. And when we're talking about something as huge as representing a constituency like ours, that means a lot.
Doug Warkentin - He came across as a sincere, bright and committed person. But, as his bio points out, he's more of a local leader and activist, he doesn't have the experience, or credibility to move into the big political leagues. We're lucky though
we have someone of his calibre living in V-K and working with us and on our behalf on local initiatives.
Don Davies - He came across as thoughtful, focused, intelligent, a quick thinker, and committed to representing the interests the wide range of citizens in the riding. I think in all honesty, his track record in the riding and the community, as well as his
performance last night demonstrate he is the best candidate to represent the interests and needs of Vancouver-Kingsway.
***********************************************************
Some other things - Someone actually stole my Don Davies - NDP sign right off my lawn last night and although I certainly can't say who it was, Salomon Rayek's people were leafletting in the neighbourhood yesterday as well.
And I have to say, his brochure leaves me VERY unimpressed with the following:
President of a local Electoral District Association for the Conservative Party. Lets be clear - Mr. Rayek has no ties to Vancouver-Kingsway at all. He's been involved with the Richmond-Delta East Conservative Association since at least 2006.
He doesn't live, or work in the riding and in fact is strongly tied to Richmond. I find this choice of language deceptive and unacceptable for a candidate running in this riding.
Also, Mr. Rayek's brochure informs us he is a "regular blood donor," which although that qualifies for my Laugh of the Day, it certaintly doesn't make me feel he's qualified to run to represent our riding in any way.
When one examines About Salomen Rayek, we can see he hasn't done one single thing in this riding, has no political, or community involvement (except with his synagogue, his "place of worship in the riding"), has no political, or community experience beyond holding positions within the neoConservative party. When you add on that he won't attend All Candidate Forums, he won't speak to local media, and he won't meet with constituents in public gathering, why on Earth would anyone waste a vote on this guy? And that is what a vote for Salomon Rayek would be - a waste of a precious Vancouver-Kingsway vote.
===================================================================================
Second All Candidates Meeting tonight
Date: Tuesday, October 7th 2008
Time: 7pm
Location: Collingwood Neighbourhood House
5288 Joyce (@ Euclid, just down from the Skytrain station).
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
I love your words on Ms. Yuan. She doesn't have the ability to represent the riding. I don't understand why she wants to be a candidate.
This is a letter I found on the comments area of national post on Wendy Yuan:
http://network.nationalpost.com/np/blogs/fullcomment/archive/2008/10/07/leeshai-lemish-the-games-are-over-the-persecution-continues.aspx
===
Dear liberal candidates,
I am writing with our serious concerns that the Liberal Party candidate Ms. Wendy Yuan, speaking of the Liberal Party policy regarding the torture and killing of Falun Gong in China, stated "for Falun Gong, our policy is not to interfere other country's internal affair" at an all-candidate debate in Vancouver on October 4, 2008, while all the rest of the Candidates all spoke for protecting the basic rights of Falun Gong practitioners.
We were shocked beyond belief to hear this statement from Ms. Yuan about the Liberal Party's policy. Why would the Liberal Party’s policy on Falun Gong reflect the Chinese Communist Party (CCP)’s policy? For the purpose of stopping the condemnation and criticism from the international community toward its horrific human rights abuses, CCP has already claimed their rights abuses to be “internal affairs”.
However, human rights abuse is not an internal affair. The murder and torture of world citizens for their beliefs is NOT an internal affair. It is a crime against humanity and against all human, international, and constitutional laws! We hereby write to you to seek answers and clarifications from the Liberal Party on its position of the ongoing persecution of Falun Gong. We would start with giving you the necessary background:
What is happening to Falun Gong in China
First of all, Falun Gong is a spiritual practice with a principle of "Truth-Compassion-Forbearance" and five sets of gentle exercises and meditation. It was widely accepted in China before 1999 when the persecution started because of Falun Gong’s popularity. The CCP leader at the time, Jiang Zemin, declared that the CCP must defeat Falun Gong.
For the past nine years, the persecution of Falun Gong has been a crucial and essential part of the human right abuses in China and the persecution has been happening systematically across the nation. UN Special Rapporteur Manfred Nowak reaffirmed in his 2007 report that Falun Gong practitioners accounted for 66 percent of victims of alleged torture while in government custody. US State Department annual reports indicated that Falun Gong adherents constituted at least half of the 250,000 officially recorded inmates in reeducation-through-labour camps, while the real number could be even higher.
The Hon. David Kilgour, former Liberal MP, and Mr. David Matas, renowned human rights lawyer, concluded in their independent investigation report that "there has been and continues today to be large scale organ seizures from unwilling Falun Gong practitioners" by the "the government of China and its agencies in numerous parts of the country"; “The widespread killing of Falun Gong practitioners for profit to provide organs for transplants is "so shocking that it represents a new form of evil on this planet.”
According to the Falun Dafa Information Center more than 3,100 practitioners have been tortured to death to date. Many more cases of detention and death remain unreported, as the Chinese regime imposes an information blockade, and reporting these cases to outside authorities constitutes a severe “crime” of "leaking state secrets."
Millions upon millions of Falun Gong practitioners have lost their jobs, housing, education, and all basic rights and have been incarcerated and tortured for refusing to give up their belief. No lawyer was allowed to defend them. Lawyer Gao Zhisheng, "the conscience of Chinese lawyers," lost his license to practice, his law firm was shut down, and he was incarcerated himself for defending a Falun Gong practitioner, and for writing to Chinese leaders calling for an end to the persecution.
Persecution affects Canadians
The persecution also affects Canadians. Currently, thirteen family members of Canadians and practitioners of Falun Gong are currently incarcerated in China for their belief in Falun Gong. Yue Yao, wife of Canadian resident Wenyu Liu in Calgary, is one of 12 jailed practitioners with Canadian ties. In 2001 Ms. Yao was sentenced to 12 years in prison for downloading information from Falun Gong websites and printing leaflets for distribution. Mr. Jian Ma, husband of Ms. Yao Lian in Montreal, is currently serving 2.5 years in forced labor camp for having Falun Gong-related documents at his home.
What is the responsibility of the international community
We have appreciated the help from members of the Liberal Party, such as Prof. Irwin Cotler, who was instrumental in rescuing Canadian Falun Gong practitioner Kunlun Zhang in 2001. There are also others who have supported us; I will not list their names one by one here.
It is disheartening, however, to see statements from your candidate that your current policy on this issue is not to "interfere with China's internal affairs".
Now the victims of the persecution are not just practitioners of Falun Gong. The persecution of Falun Gong is a persecution of the human conscience of our elected officials, and the candidates for the elections also. When facing such a "new evil on this planet", should the candidates and your elected officials be turning a blind eye to such atrocities in exchange for business, trade, and other interests under the excuse of so-called “engagement”? Should the international community label it a Chinese “internal affair” to avoid their moral and social responsibility?
Dr. Martin Luther King said: "Injustice anywhere is injustice everywhere." China is a signatory of the UN Declaration of Human Rights; so is Canada. Does Canada also have a responsibility to urge the stop of the persecution of Falun Gong practitioners?
With this letter, we seek clarification from the Liberal Party on your policy regarding:
1. the ongoing human rights abuses in China against Falun Gong in general; and
2. efforts in rescuing the family member of Canadians who are incarcerated in China for their Falun Gong belief.
We look forward to hearing from you.
Sincerely,
Lucy Zhou
Falun Dafa Association of Canada
Post a Comment